+1 DMG Per Revive

Source Policy

Why We Publish Sources

Every code, tier ranking, and unit claim on this site is built by aggregating publicly available information rather than by original in-house testing. Because of that, we treat source transparency as essential: readers should be able to see exactly where a claim came from and judge its reliability for themselves. This page lists every source type this site draws from and explains how each one is used in practice, referenced from pages such as the codes list and the tier list.

Official Channels

Official channels, including Big Lemon Game Studio's own Roblox game page, are treated as the first-priority source for anything they publish directly, such as patch notes or store listings.

Gaming Media

Gaming-media outlets are used to cross-verify redemption codes and tier placements. A code needs confirmation from at least two independent outlets in this group before it is marked active.

Video Creators

Video creators provide hands-on gameplay reference, such as showing a code being redeemed on screen or demonstrating a item's behavior, which helps confirm claims that text sources alone cannot.

Status Label System

Every code and many other time-sensitive claims carry one of four status labels:

  • active — confirmed working by at least two independent sources, most often gaming-media outlets or official channels.
  • reported — seen on exactly one gaming-media source, not yet independently confirmed.
  • needs-check — seen only in community discussion, such as Reddit, with no gaming-media confirmation yet.
  • expired — previously confirmed working, now verified as no longer redeemable.

Recheck Schedule

Codes and tier rankings are re-verified whenever +1 DMG Per Revive ships a new update or a code is reported expired by a source. Every entry carries a checked date so you can see how recently it was reviewed. Questions about a specific source or a claim that looks outdated can be sent through the contact page.

What We Do Not Do

This site does not invent stat values, drop rates, or reward amounts when a source has not published them. If a figure cannot be traced back to a patch note, a gaming-media article, or a clearly labeled community report, it is left out or explicitly marked as unverified rather than filled in with a guess. This is a deliberate policy, not an oversight — publishing a confident-sounding number that nobody actually confirmed would defeat the purpose of the labeling system described above. See the about page for more on how this policy shapes the rest of the site.